DSO XXXD0 of type 'Direct Update' has been defined with 6 IOBJs as key fields in RSA1.
In SE11 the active table /BIC/AXXXD000 only shows 1 of the above IOBJs as a key field.
There are several records in table /BIC/AXXXD000 all with the same value for the field marked as 'key' in SE11.
Normal SELECT statements in ABAP workbench returns garbage.
Is this normal???
If it is normal can anybody explain how it can be? ... and most importantly why it is like this.
Info: system BW7.4 on HANA
Screenshots:
DSO definition in BW:
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
SE11 technical settings of active table:
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Content of the same table in SE11:
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
SELECT statement:
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Debugger shows garbage:
